B Proof of Lemma 4.3
ثبت نشده
چکیده
(1) Suppose that w belongs to a C d , d r. The total number of leaves in C 0 ; : : :; C d?1 is P d?1 j=0 2 j = 2 d ? 1. Therefore, 2 d ? 1 < i. Since w belongs to C d , i P d j=0 2 j = 2 d+1 ? 1. Thus, 2 d i < 2 d+1 , implying that d = blog ic. Consider the path from the root of T r to w. The path has length 2d + 1: d edges on the path from the root of T r to v d , one edge connecting v d and the root of C d , and d edges on the path from the root of C d to w. Since d = blog w i c, the length of the path is 2blog ic + 1. (2) Deene a binary string b1 : : :2d + 1], which represents the path from the root of T r to w, as follows: b1] = 1; for any 1 j < 2d + 1, bj + 1] = 0, if the (j + 1)th vertex on the path is the left child of its parent; and bj + 1] = 1, otherwise. The numbering of the vertices in T r implies that the number of w is represented by the binary string b1 : : :2d + 1]. The d leftmost bits of b, corresponding to the path from the root of the tree to vertex v d are 11 : : :1, since all the vertices on the path are right children (see Figure 3(b)). The (d+1)th bit of b is 0, since the root of C d is the left child of v d. It remains to calculate the d rightmost bits of b, corresponding to the path from the root of C d to w. The total number of leaves in C 0 ; : : :; C d?1 is P d?1 j=0 2 j = 2 d ?1. Since w is the ith leaf in T r , it is the (i ?(2 d ?1))th leaf in C d , counting from 1. Therefore, the d bits corresponding to the path from the root of C d to w are the binary representation of the number (i ? (2 d ? 1)) …
منابع مشابه
A simple proof of Zariski's Lemma
Our aim in this very short note is to show that the proof of the following well-known fundamental lemma of Zariski follows from an argument similar to the proof of the fact that the rational field $mathbb{Q}$ is not a finitely generated $mathbb{Z}$-algebra.
متن کاملFuzzy Linear Programming and its Application for a Constructive Proof of a Fuzzy Version of Farkas Lemma
The main aim of this paper is to deal with a fuzzy version of Farkas lemma involving trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. In turns to that the fuzzy linear programming and duality theory on these problems can be used to provide a constructive proof for Farkas lemma. Keywords Farkas Lemma, Fuzzy Linear Programming, Duality, Ranking Functions.
متن کاملNotes on Perelman’s Second Paper
Introduction 1 1. Section II-1.2 3 2. Section II-1.3 4 3. II-1.4 5 4. II-1.5. Definition of canonical neighborhoods 5 5. Section II-2 8 6. Section II-3 13 7. Section II-4.1 15 8. Section II-4.2 16 9. II-4.3; Lemma II-4.3 17 10. II-4.4: the surgery 18 11. Definition of surgery 19 12. Lemma II-4.5 20 13. Corollary II-4.6 21 14. Corollary II-4.7 22 15. Section II-5.1 22 16. Lemma II-5.2: κ-noncoll...
متن کاملWeighted Least Squares Approximate Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estima - tion of Vector Autoregressive Processes
4 Appendix S-1 4.1 Proof of Lemma 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-1 4.2 Proof of Theorem 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-4 4.3 Proof of Theorem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-8 4.4 Proof of Theorem 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
متن کاملA General Equilibrium Model of Statistical Disrcimination - Omitted Appendices
B Omitted Proofs 2 B.1 How to make individual and aggregate distributions coincide . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 B.2 Proof of Lemma 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 B.3 Proof of Lemma A1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 B.4 Proof of Lemma A2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
متن کاملThe Boundedness of Degree of Fano Varieties with Picard Number One
CONTENTS O. Introduction 1. Rational curves 1.1. Deformation theory of morphisms 1.2. Free rational curves 1.3. The invariant d(M) 2. Special subvarieties in Fano varieties of large degree 2.1. The statement 2.2. A Siegel type lemma 2.3. Multiplicity subspaces 2.4. The product theorem, part I 2.S. The product theorem, part II 2.6. The proof 3. The covering lemma 4. Collections of subsets 4.1. B...
متن کامل